Pallavi Ajay Shinde vs State of Maharashtra — 26/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA140004952026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2026
Filing Number
168/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
26/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
224
Police Station
Police Station Ausa
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pallavi Ajay Shinde
Adv. Swapnil Sunil Tambe
-
2.Kavita Sanjippa Shinde
Adv. Swapnil Sunil Tambe
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Pallavi Ajay Shinde v. State of Maharashtra (26/2026) The court granted interim custody of two seized motorcycles to the registered owners upon executing indemnity bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each, reasoning that the owners were entitled to possession and prolonged police storage would deteriorate the vehicles. The applicants must comply with conditions prohibiting structural changes, disposal, or transfer until trial conclusion, and must produce the vehicles as required by investigating officers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
17-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
13-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
10-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
06-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
27-Feb-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 26/2026
Case Summary: Pallavi Ajay Shinde v. State of Maharashtra (26/2026) The court granted interim custody of two seized motorcycles to the registered owners upon executing indemnity bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each, reasoning that the owners were entitled to possession and prolonged police storage would deteriorate the vehicles. The applicants must comply with conditions prohibiting structural changes, disposal, or transfer until trial conclusion, and must produce the vehicles as required by investigating officers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts