Balaji Pandurang Shinde vs Govind Bhimrao Lomte and other 2 Advocate - Kumbhar Vaijnath A — 37/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7rule1and2. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA140001252025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

10-01-2025

Filing Number

83/2025

Filing Date

13-01-2025

Registration No

37/2025

Registration Date

13-01-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

2-2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Order7rule1and2

Petitioner(s)

Balaji Pandurang Shinde

Adv. KULKARNI ARVIND GOVINDRAO

Respondent(s)

Govind Bhimrao Lomte and other 2 Advocate - Kumbhar Vaijnath A

Vyankat Dudha Shinde

Keshav Shankar Mudgade

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

05-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

08-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

25-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

02-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

05-01-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: R.C.S. 37/2025 – Balaji Pandurang Shinde v. Govind Bhimrao Lomte and others The court allowed the plaintiff's application for appointment of a Court Commissioner. The T.I.L.R. (Tahsildar-cum-Inspector of Land Records), Ausa, was appointed to measure the disputed property at Nagarsoga and prepare a measurement map to determine encroachment claims between adjacent landholders. The plaintiff was directed to bear commissioner expenses, deposit fees, supply required documents, and the commissioner was ordered to complete the measurement report within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. 37/2025 – Balaji Pandurang Shinde v. Govind Bhimrao Lomte and others The court allowed the plaintiff's application for appointment of a Court Commissioner. The T.I.L.R. (Tahsildar-cum-Inspector of Land Records), Ausa, was appointed to measure the disputed property at Nagarsoga and prepare a measurement map to determine encroachment claims between adjacent landholders. The plaintiff was directed to bear commissioner expenses, deposit fees, supply required documents, and the commissioner was ordered to complete the measurement report within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case