Mahadev Ganpati Bankar vs Nil — 10/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 4,5. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHLA140000222026

e-Filing Number

01-01-2026

Filing Number

15/2026

Filing Date

02-Jan-2026

Registration No

10/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 4,5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahadev Ganpati Bankar

    Adv. KALDATE PRAKASH NARSINGRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 10/2026 - Mahadev Ganpati Bankar The court granted the petitioner Mahadev Ganpati Bankar's application for an Heirship Certificate under the Bombay Regulation, recognizing him as the legal heir of deceased Ganpati Siddheshwar Bankar (died 25/03/1995) and Bhagirathi Ganpati Bankar (died 25/03/1996). The court found the petitioner's evidence, including death certificates and witness statements, sufficient to establish heirship and confirmed no other legal heirs exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 10/2026 - Mahadev Ganpati Bankar The court granted the petitioner Mahadev Ganpati Bankar's application for an Heirship Certificate under the Bombay Regulation, recognizing him as the legal heir of deceased Ganpati Siddheshwar Bankar (died 25/03/1995) and Bhagirathi Ganpati Bankar (died 25/03/1996). The court found the petitioner's evidence, including death certificates and witness statements, sufficient to establish heirship and confirmed no other legal heirs exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case