Balbhim Gopal Jadhav vs Gopal Harishchandra Jadhav — 308/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA130014632025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

e-Filing Number

14-12-2025

Filing Number

708/2025

Filing Date

15-12-2025

Registration No

308/2025

Registration Date

15-12-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Renapur

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1

Petitioner(s)

Balbhim Gopal Jadhav

Adv. YADAV SHIRISH UDHAVRAO

Mandakini Balbhim Jadhav

Adv. YADAV SHIRISH UDHAVRAO

Respondent(s)

Gopal Harishchandra Jadhav

Sunil Gopal Jadhav

Jayshree Sunil Jadhav

Sudhakar Gopal Jadhav

Mohan Gopal Jadhav

Radhabai Shivaji Jadhav

Tanaji Shivaji Jadhav

Netaji Shivaji Jadhav

Kanchan @ Manisha w/o Prakash Pawar

Mahananda Baburao Bharaskar

Sharda Dattatraya Kate

Ganesh Dattu Munde

Madan Dnyanoba Barure

Namdeo Achyut Bhosale

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Renapur

07-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

23-04-2026

Awaiting Summons

17-04-2026

Awaiting Summons

13-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

26-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

16-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case 308/2025 Summary: The court ordered that the disputed property (3 acres 25 gunthas, Plot No. 127) be maintained in status quo until the next hearing. The petitioners (Balbhim Gopal Jadhav and Mandakini Balbhim Jadhav) sought to preserve the property's status, claiming inheritance rights through Chandrabha. Since respondents failed to produce death certificates or property transfer documents, the court issued ex-parte orders against them and directed service of notice under CPC Rule 39(3), with an affidavit to be filed by respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 308/2025 Summary: The court ordered that the disputed property (3 acres 25 gunthas, Plot No. 127) be maintained in status quo until the next hearing. The petitioners (Balbhim Gopal Jadhav and Mandakini Balbhim Jadhav) sought to preserve the property's status, claiming inheritance rights through Chandrabha. Since respondents failed to produce death certificates or property transfer documents, the court issued ex-parte orders against them and directed service of notice under CPC Rule 39(3), with an affidavit to be filed by respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case