Akshata Dnyaneshwar Sude vs Nil — 361/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA130013642025
e-Filing Number
21-11-2025
Filing Number
662/2025
Filing Date
21-Nov-2025
Registration No
361/2025
Registration Date
24-Nov-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Renapur
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Akshata Dnyaneshwar Sude
Adv. THORMOTE RAKESH TUKARAM
-
2.Adhira Dnyaneshwar Sude UG Akshata Dnyaneshwar Sude
Adv. THORMOTE RAKESH TUKARAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: 361/2025 The court granted a Heirship Certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827 to the applicants (wife Akshada, daughter Adhira, and mother Chandrakala) of deceased Dnyaneshwar Bhagwan Sude, who died on 12.10.2023. The court found the applicants were legal heirs based on their affidavit evidence, death certificate, Aadhaar cards, and newspaper publication, with no objections filed against the claim during the notice period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Renapur
-
04-Feb-2026
Public Notice/Proclamation
Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Renapur
-
07-Jan-2026
Public Notice/Proclamation
Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Renapur
-
26-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 361/2025
Case Summary: 361/2025 The court granted a Heirship Certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827 to the applicants (wife Akshada, daughter Adhira, and mother Chandrakala) of deceased Dnyaneshwar Bhagwan Sude, who died on 12.10.2023. The court found the applicants were legal heirs based on their affidavit evidence, death certificate, Aadhaar cards, and newspaper publication, with no objections filed against the claim during the notice period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts