Faruq s/o. Nasir Shaikh vs Grmsevak Grampanchayat Indrathana, Shri. S.N. Ugile Advocate - Jadhav Prashant Y — 424/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE on 11th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA130012412022
Filing Number
694/2022
Filing Date
21-10-2022
Registration No
424/2022
Registration Date
21-10-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Decision Date
11th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Faruq s/o. Nasir Shaikh
Adv. Adude Pandurang M
Respondent(s)
Grmsevak Grampanchayat Indrathana, Shri. S.N. Ugile Advocate - Jadhav Prashant Y
Sarpanch Grampanchyat Indrathana, Shri Avinasha Satish Randive
Upsarpanch Grampanchayat Indarthana, Ibrahim Khairat Sayyed
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Faruq s/o. Nasir Shaikh v. Gramsevak Grampanchayat Indrathana (RCS 424/2022) Decision: The court granted a perpetual injunction in favor of the plaintiff, decreeing the suit with costs. The court found that the plaintiff had established ownership and peaceful possession of property (GP House No. 310) for over 12 years, supported by tax receipts, electricity connection, and gram panchayat records. The defendants were perpetually restrained from causing any obstruction or interference with the plaintiff's possession after issuing encroachment removal notices without substantiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Faruq s/o. Nasir Shaikh v. Gramsevak Grampanchayat Indrathana (RCS 424/2022) Decision: The court granted a perpetual injunction in favor of the plaintiff, decreeing the suit with costs. The court found that the plaintiff had established ownership and peaceful possession of property (GP House No. 310) for over 12 years, supported by tax receipts, electricity connection, and gram panchayat records. The defendants were perpetually restrained from causing any obstruction or interference with the plaintiff's possession after issuing encroachment removal notices without substantiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts