Meenabai Bhagwat Bombade vs Balasaheb Ram Adatrao and other 2 Advocate - Adude Pandurang M — 185/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7r1. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA130011282019
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
369/2019
Filing Date
13-12-2019
Registration No
185/2019
Registration Date
13-12-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Renapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Meenabai Bhagwat Bombade
Adv. Bombilwad Balasaheb B, Phunde keshav A
Respondent(s)
Balasaheb Ram Adatrao and other 2 Advocate - Adude Pandurang M
Yati @ Dnyaneshwar Balasaheb Adatrao
Yayati Balasaheb Adatrao
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Renapur
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 185/2019 Meenabai Bhagwat Bombade v. Balasaheb Ram Adatrao and Others This land dispute case involved testimony regarding agricultural property ownership and a contested sale deed. The petitioner claimed rightful possession and denied allegations of forging documents or making false claims. The respondents disputed the petitioner's title and alleged fraudulent conduct. The court recorded cross-examination of witnesses on issues including property boundaries, cultivation rights, payment disputes, and the validity of the sale transaction. Outcome: Case adjourned for further proceedings; judgment reserved pending post-hearing deliberation (Order dated July 29, 2025). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 185/2019 Meenabai Bhagwat Bombade v. Balasaheb Ram Adatrao and Others This land dispute case involved testimony regarding agricultural property ownership and a contested sale deed. The petitioner claimed rightful possession and denied allegations of forging documents or making false claims. The respondents disputed the petitioner's title and alleged fraudulent conduct. The court recorded cross-examination of witnesses on issues including property boundaries, cultivation rights, payment disputes, and the validity of the sale transaction. Outcome: Case adjourned for further proceedings; judgment reserved pending post-hearing deliberation (Order dated July 29, 2025). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts