State of Maharashtra vs Nagu alias Naganath Satvaji Khatik Advocate - Nagargoje Dhanraj P — 407/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA130010052019
Filing Number
661/2019
Filing Date
13-11-2019
Registration No
407/2019
Registration Date
13-11-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
195
Police Station
Renapur
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Nagu alias Naganath Satvaji Khatik Advocate - Nagargoje Dhanraj P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 407/2019 The court acquitted the accused, Nagu alias Naganath Satvaji Khatik, of charges under IPC sections 279 and 427 (rash driving and damage to property). Despite the complainant's testimony that the accused's tipper truck struck his water tanker on 04.05.2019 causing it to overturn with damage valued at ₹3,00,000, the court found insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as no corroborating documentary evidence or additional witnesses were produced by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 407/2019 The court acquitted the accused, Nagu alias Naganath Satvaji Khatik, of charges under IPC sections 279 and 427 (rash driving and damage to property). Despite the complainant's testimony that the accused's tipper truck struck his water tanker on 04.05.2019 causing it to overturn with damage valued at ₹3,00,000, the court found insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as no corroborating documentary evidence or additional witnesses were produced by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts