State of Maharashtra vs Anil Kondiram Rautrao — 292/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA130009212025

Filing Number

473/2025

Filing Date

30-Jul-2025

Registration No

292/2025

Registration Date

30-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

61

Police Station

Excise Dept.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anil Kondiram Rautrao

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Anil Kondiram Rautrao of charges under section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the absence of a Chemical Analyzer report rendered conviction impossible despite other witness evidence. The proceedings were terminated under section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, his bail bond was cancelled, and 33 bottles of seized country liquor were directed to be sent to the State Excise office for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur

  6. 30-Dec-2025

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur

  8. 14-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 30-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 292/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Anil Kondiram Rautrao of charges under section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the absence of a Chemical Analyzer report rendered conviction impossible despite other witness evidence. The proceedings were terminated under section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, his bail bond was cancelled, and 33 bottles of seized country liquor were directed to be sent to the State Excise office for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case