State of Maharashtra vs Dnyaneshwar Narayan Madake — 161/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA130008652024
Filing Number
419/2024
Filing Date
10-09-2024
Registration No
161/2024
Registration Date
10-09-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
74
Police Station
Renapur
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Dnyaneshwar Narayan Madake
Govind Shankar Veer
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 16-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 14-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Dnyaneshwar Narayan Madke & Govind Shankar Vir (161/2024) Both accused were convicted under Section 12A of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act for accepting bets on Time Bazar Matka gambling in a public place on 06/03/2023. They pleaded guilty before the court. The Judicial Magistrate sentenced each to a fine of Rs. 300, with default imprisonment of three days, after considering their plea for leniency based on their impoverished status and family dependence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Dnyaneshwar Narayan Madke & Govind Shankar Vir (161/2024) Both accused were convicted under Section 12A of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act for accepting bets on Time Bazar Matka gambling in a public place on 06/03/2023. They pleaded guilty before the court. The Judicial Magistrate sentenced each to a fine of Rs. 300, with default imprisonment of three days, after considering their plea for leniency based on their impoverished status and family dependence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts