State of Maharashtra vs Deelip Dhansing Rathod — 156/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(kh)(d). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA130008522024
Filing Number
409/2024
Filing Date
09-09-2024
Registration No
156/2024
Registration Date
09-09-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Renapur
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
258
Police Station
Renapur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Deelip Dhansing Rathod
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Renapur
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 09-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 156/2024 Summary The Renapur Judicial Magistrate acquitted Deelip Dhansing Rathod of charges under Section 65(kh)(d) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and failed to file the required CA report, and given the case's pending status since 2024, continuing the matter served no purpose. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and seized materials ordered destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 156/2024 Summary The Renapur Judicial Magistrate acquitted Deelip Dhansing Rathod of charges under Section 65(kh)(d) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and failed to file the required CA report, and given the case's pending status since 2024, continuing the matter served no purpose. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and seized materials ordered destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts