Rabiyabee Rajjak Sayyad vs Rajjak Bapumiyya Sayyad and other 3 Advocate - Katale Devidas S — 156/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7r1. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA130008442019
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
300/2019
Filing Date
21-09-2019
Registration No
156/2019
Registration Date
21-09-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rabiyabee Rajjak Sayyad
Adv. Pathan Jabbar K
Respondent(s)
Rajjak Bapumiyya Sayyad and other 3 Advocate - Katale Devidas S
Salim Rajjak Sayyad
Adv. Katale Devidas S
Mujammil Rajjak Sayyad
Adv. Katale Devidas S
Ismail Rajjak Sayyad
Adv. Katale Devidas S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 156/2019 Summary Rabiyabee Rajjak Sayyad v. Rajjak Bapumiyya Sayyad & Others The petitioner's application to make corrections and amendments to the civil suit regarding property ownership was granted. The court permitted the rectification of clerical and typographical errors in the suit documents (specifically concerning revenue survey reference numbers 282 and 456, and the year of property acquisition changing from 1983 to 1985). The petitioner was ordered to pay costs of ₹400 to the respondent, and must file the corrected suit documents within the specified timeframe before the respondent is served notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 156/2019 Summary Rabiyabee Rajjak Sayyad v. Rajjak Bapumiyya Sayyad & Others The petitioner's application to make corrections and amendments to the civil suit regarding property ownership was granted. The court permitted the rectification of clerical and typographical errors in the suit documents (specifically concerning revenue survey reference numbers 282 and 456, and the year of property acquisition changing from 1983 to 1985). The petitioner was ordered to pay costs of ₹400 to the respondent, and must file the corrected suit documents within the specified timeframe before the respondent is served notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts