Dinkar Keshavrao Kulkarni vs Ashok Raghunath Kulkarni and other 5 Advocate - Saravade Dasharath T — 4/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O20r11. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition
CNR: MHLA130005782018
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
225/2018
Filing Date
30-08-2018
Registration No
4/2018
Registration Date
31-08-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dinkar Keshavrao Kulkarni
Adv. Bidwe Dhananjay R
Respondent(s)
Ashok Raghunath Kulkarni and other 5 Advocate - Saravade Dasharath T
Tukaram Nagu Chavan ( Died)
Smt. Rukmini Tukaram Chavan
Adv. Saravade Dasharath T
Vishnu Tukaram Chavan
Adv. Saravade Dasharath T
Mahadev Tukaram Chavan
Adv. Saravade Dasharath T
Suresh Tukaram Chavan
Adv. Saravade Dasharath T
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 10-04-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 05-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 03-01-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.D. No. 04/2018 (Dinkar Keshavrao Kulkarni v. Ashok Raghunath Kulkarni and others) The court allowed the execution petition and directed defendants (JD Nos. 2/1 to 2/4) to remove obstacles from a drainage nala (channel) within one month to enable proper water flow, as per the original decree from RCS 263/2008. The court found defendants had failed to comply with a 2010 compromise agreement requiring obstacle removal. If defendants fail to comply, petitioner is entitled to remove obstacles himself and recover costs from defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.D. No. 04/2018 (Dinkar Keshavrao Kulkarni v. Ashok Raghunath Kulkarni and others) The court allowed the execution petition and directed defendants (JD Nos. 2/1 to 2/4) to remove obstacles from a drainage nala (channel) within one month to enable proper water flow, as per the original decree from RCS 263/2008. The court found defendants had failed to comply with a 2010 compromise agreement requiring obstacle removal. If defendants fail to comply, petitioner is entitled to remove obstacles himself and recover costs from defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts