Narayan Rukmaji Motipalle vs Baliram Mahadu Motipalle Advocate - Solunke Shivraj A — 97/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7r1. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA130005742019
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
182/2019
Filing Date
26-06-2019
Registration No
97/2019
Registration Date
26-06-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Renapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Narayan Rukmaji Motipalle
Adv. Mande Kailaspati K
Manik Rukmaji Motipalle
Maruti Rukmaji Motipalle
Shivdas @ Shivaji Rukmaji Motipalle
Ashok Rukmaji Motipalle
Respondent(s)
Baliram Mahadu Motipalle Advocate - Solunke Shivraj A
Sugriv Baliram Motipalle
Parmeshwar Baliram Motipalle
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Renapur
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 11-04-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 97/2019 SKIP The document is largely unreadable. While the case number and parties are identifiable, the court order text in Marathi is severely garbled with numerous formatting errors, missing characters (represented as blanks), and corrupted text that makes it impossible to determine the actual court decision or outcome. The document appears to contain witness testimony transcripts rather than a clear final judgment or order, and the corrupted state prevents accurate analysis of what was decided in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 97/2019 SKIP The document is largely unreadable. While the case number and parties are identifiable, the court order text in Marathi is severely garbled with numerous formatting errors, missing characters (represented as blanks), and corrupted text that makes it impossible to determine the actual court decision or outcome. The document appears to contain witness testimony transcripts rather than a clear final judgment or order, and the corrupted state prevents accurate analysis of what was decided in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts