Narsing Ramling Bhatangle vs Santram Gurunath Shivappa Bhatangle — 104/2024

Case 104/2024 Summary Outcome: Petitioner Narsing Ramling Bhatangle's petition (Injunction Order 5) seeking to restrain respondent Santram Gurunath Shivappa Bhatangle from interfering with his possession and enjoyment of disputed agricultural land was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish prima facie that the respondent was obstructing his peaceful possession. The petitioner alleged respondent encroached on 53 acres of his inherited property, but could not substantiate the encroachment with documentary evidence (such as survey maps). The court noted no irreparable harm would result from dismissing the petition, whereas granting it could cause unquantifiable damage to respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.