Tukaram Kishanrao Bade vs Dnyanoba Kishanrao Bade Advocate - Bedre Venkat B — 92/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA130003352024
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
12-04-2024
Filing Number
196/2024
Filing Date
12-04-2024
Registration No
92/2024
Registration Date
12-04-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Renapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tukaram Kishanrao Bade
Adv. KANSE TANAJI RAMRAJE
Respondent(s)
Dnyanoba Kishanrao Bade Advocate - Bedre Venkat B
Kalyani D/o. Dnyanoba Bade
Adv. Bedre Venkat B
Pooja Dnyanoba Bade
Adv. Bedre Venkat B
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Renapur
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 20-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 04-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 26-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Case 92/2024 Summary: The court allowed the application of respondents (Defendants 4-9) and set aside the ex-parte order that was previously passed against them. The court found that respondents 4-9 have significant rights and interests at stake in the property dispute and deserved an opportunity to present their defense under natural justice principles. Respondents 4-9 were imposed a penalty of ₹200, which was waived, and ordered to pay the penalty amount to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 92/2024 Summary: The court allowed the application of respondents (Defendants 4-9) and set aside the ex-parte order that was previously passed against them. The court found that respondents 4-9 have significant rights and interests at stake in the property dispute and deserved an opportunity to present their defense under natural justice principles. Respondents 4-9 were imposed a penalty of ₹200, which was waived, and ordered to pay the penalty amount to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts