Ahemad s/o Vazir Shaikh and other 6(Legal Heir) vs Laxman s/o Keshav Bhise and other 2 Advocate - Dixit Vishal V — 1800129/2011
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA130002212011
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
1800129/2011
Filing Date
11-11-2011
Registration No
1800129/2011
Registration Date
14-11-2011
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ahemad s/o Vazir Shaikh and other 6(Legal Heir)
Adv. Inamdar Habiboddin K1.
Rapiyabi w/o. Ahemad Shaikh
Adv. Inamdar Habiboddin K1.
Jabbar s/o. Ahemad Shaikh
Adv. Inamdar Habiboddin K1.
Imamshah s/o. Ahemad Shaikh
Adv. Inamdar Habiboddin K
Saberali s/o Vazir Shaikh
Adv. Inamdar Habiboddin K
Bashir s/o Vazir Shaikh
Adv. Inamdar Habiboddin K
Hamedabee w/o Maheboob Shaikh
Adv. Inamdar Habiboddin K
Tamizbee w/o Dastgir Shaikh
Adv. Inamdar Habiboddin K
Zoharbee w/o Mahemood Shaikh
Adv. Inamdar Habiboddin K
Mannabee w/o Sadiq Sayyad
Adv. Inamdar Habiboddin K
Respondent(s)
Laxman s/o Keshav Bhise and other 2 Advocate - Dixit Vishal V
Satyashila w/o Sopan Kshirsagar
Ushabai w/o Prakash Rathod
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Ahemad and others Vs. Laxman and others (RCS 129/2011) The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to lead secondary evidence regarding a 1978 sale deed (D.B. No. 2850) for land in Bhokramba village. The original document was lost after the plaintiffs' mother (the deed's custodian) passed away in 2006, but a certified copy existed on record. The court found the loss was not due to the plaintiffs' default or neglect and permitted use of the certified copy as secondary evidence under Section 65(c) of the Indian Evidence Act, as the plaintiffs demonstrated they made sincere efforts to locate the original. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Ahemad and others Vs. Laxman and others (RCS 129/2011) The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to lead secondary evidence regarding a 1978 sale deed (D.B. No. 2850) for land in Bhokramba village. The original document was lost after the plaintiffs' mother (the deed's custodian) passed away in 2006, but a certified copy existed on record. The court found the loss was not due to the plaintiffs' default or neglect and permitted use of the certified copy as secondary evidence under Section 65(c) of the Indian Evidence Act, as the plaintiffs demonstrated they made sincere efforts to locate the original. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts