Dattatraya s/o Shankar Rathod (died) and other 6(Legal Heir) vs Shankar Govind Rathod and other 5 Advocate - Zadke Dhanraj V, Zadke, ZadkeZadke Dhanraj V, — 1800042/2011
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA130002112011
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
1800042/2011
Filing Date
13-04-2011
Registration No
1800042/2011
Registration Date
13-04-2011
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dattatraya s/o Shankar Rathod (died) and other 6(Legal Heir)
Adv. Dixit Vishal V1.
Saurabha s/o. Dattatraya Rathod 1.
Pravin s/o. Dattatray Rathod 1.
Vimal w/o. Dattatray Rathd 1.
Pooja w/o. Santosh Chavan
Nath Shankar Rathod
Adv. Dixit Vishal V
Jotiram Shankar Rathod
Adv. Dixit Vishal V,Zadke Dhanraj V
Respondent(s)
Shankar Govind Rathod and other 5 Advocate - Zadke Dhanraj V, Zadke, ZadkeZadke Dhanraj V,
Pannabai w/o Shankar Rathod
Adv. Zadke Dhanraj V
Eknath Shankar Rathod
Adv. Zadke Dhanraj V
Muktabai Pandurang Chavan
Adv. Dapke Sidheshwar S
Chetan Prakash Valse
Adv. Dapke Sidheshwar S
Santaji Wamanrao Reddi
Adv. Dapke Sidheshwar S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In this partition and separate possession suit (RCS 42/2011), the court directed defendants Nos. 2 and 3 to proceed with leading their remaining evidence, warning that failure to take steps would result in closure of their evidence. The suit has been pending since December 2019 due to the defendants' inaction in advancing their case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In this partition and separate possession suit (RCS 42/2011), the court directed defendants Nos. 2 and 3 to proceed with leading their remaining evidence, warning that failure to take steps would result in closure of their evidence. The suit has been pending since December 2019 due to the defendants' inaction in advancing their case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts