Ruma Venkat Munde vs Bapu Kerba Lahane and other 6 Advocate - Waghmare Aruna R — 27/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7r1. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA130001182020
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
50/2020
Filing Date
24-01-2020
Registration No
27/2020
Registration Date
24-01-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ruma Venkat Munde
Adv. Sirsat Mohan G
Respondent(s)
Bapu Kerba Lahane and other 6 Advocate - Waghmare Aruna R
Yamunabai Bapurao Lahane
Adv. Waghmare Aruna R
Dnyanoba Bapurao Lahane
Adv. Waghmare Aruna R
Sopan Bapurao Lahane
Adv. Waghmare Aruna R
Dwarka Dnyanoba Munde
Adv. Waghmare Aruna R
Kushawarti Sadashiv Murkute
Adv. Waghmare Aruna R
Grampanchayat, Makegaon Through Sarpanch
Adv. Digule Vaijinath A_LAPA97
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 11-04-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 27/2020 — Ruma v. Bapu Kerba Lahane & Others Ruma sought a temporary injunction to restrain defendants from alienating ancestral family property, claiming she holds a 1/7th undivided share as a joint family member. The court found she established a prima facie case but partly allowed the application. The court restrained Respondent No.1 (her father, the family head/Karta) from alienating only the house property (Schedule C), as the Karta's powers are restricted regarding residential property. However, injunction was denied for the two land properties (Schedules A and B), as the Karta has broad powers to alienate landed property for legal necessity, and balance of convenience favored the respondent who possessed the land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 27/2020 — Ruma v. Bapu Kerba Lahane & Others Ruma sought a temporary injunction to restrain defendants from alienating ancestral family property, claiming she holds a 1/7th undivided share as a joint family member. The court found she established a prima facie case but partly allowed the application. The court restrained Respondent No.1 (her father, the family head/Karta) from alienating only the house property (Schedule C), as the Karta's powers are restricted regarding residential property. However, injunction was denied for the two land properties (Schedules A and B), as the Karta has broad powers to alienate landed property for legal necessity, and balance of convenience favored the respondent who possessed the land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts