Milind Dasu Suryawanshi vs Shivkanta Dasu Suryawanshi — 22/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEMENT BY MEDIATION on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA130000742026

e-Filing Number

22-01-2026

Filing Number

42/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

22/2026

Registration Date

27-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLEMENT BY MEDIATION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Milind Dasu Suryawanshi

    Adv. Shaikh Sikandar C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shivkanta Dasu Suryawanshi

  2. 2.Rahul Dasu Suryawanshi

  3. 3.Vinod Dasu Suryawanshi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court decreed the civil suit in favor of petitioner Milind Dasu Suryawanshi based on an amicable settlement (compromise pursis) reached between the plaintiff and defendants Shivkanta, Rahul, and Vinod before a mediator. The court ordered the compromise agreement be recorded with case documents, refunded the court fee per rules, and directed a formal decree be drawn accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Compromise

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Compromise

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court decreed the civil suit in favor of petitioner Milind Dasu Suryawanshi based on an amicable settlement (compromise pursis) reached between the plaintiff and defendants Shivkanta, Rahul, and Vinod before a mediator. The court ordered the compromise agreement be recorded with case documents, refunded the court fee per rules, and directed a formal decree be drawn accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case