Shivabai Baburao Sude vs Shrirang so Dattatrya Jadhav and other 19 Advocate - Kanse Tanaji R — 1800016/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA130000022007
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
1800016/2012
Filing Date
24-10-2007
Registration No
1800016/2012
Registration Date
30-01-2012
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Renapur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivabai Baburao Sude
Adv. Bhise Waman H
Respondent(s)
Shrirang so Dattatrya Jadhav and other 19 Advocate - Kanse Tanaji R
Rajkumar Dattatraya Jadhav
Adv. Naikwade Venkat M
Baburao Annasaheb Chavan
Vishnu Annasaheb Chavan
Venkatrao Annasaheb Chavan
Ganpatrao Annasaheb Chavan
Sundarabai Annasaheb Chavan
Bhimabai Venkatrao Gangane
Jankubai Sidram Karpe
Hirabai Anantrao Jadhav
Kusumbai Digambar Mane
Shivnandabai Rajkumar Poul
Madhavi Vithalrao Salunke
Venkatrao Bapurao Gangane
Mahadeo Venkatrao Gangane
Sharad Venkatrao Gangane
Indubai Ashok Jagtap
Ratanbai Ashok Deshmukh
Shobha Ashok Gaikwad
Ashwini Ganesh Kapse
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Renapur
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 16/2012 Outcome: Application allowed. The court corrected a clerical error in a prior temporary injunction order by changing "Southern side" to "Northern side" in the operative order relating to property gat no. 176 under Section 152 of the CPC. Key Facts: Plaintiff Shivabai Baburao Sude sought correction of an earlier order granting temporary injunction for the Northern portion (1 H 26 R) of the property, but the operative order mistakenly mentioned "Southern side." The defendants opposed, arguing this was an intentional judicial decision, not a clerical error. Holding: The court found the error was accidental and correctable under Section 152 CPC. The entire discussion in the original order concerned only the Northern portion, matching the plaintiff's prayer. Correcting this error would not prejudice defendants since the status quo order covered the entire property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 16/2012 Outcome: Application allowed. The court corrected a clerical error in a prior temporary injunction order by changing "Southern side" to "Northern side" in the operative order relating to property gat no. 176 under Section 152 of the CPC. Key Facts: Plaintiff Shivabai Baburao Sude sought correction of an earlier order granting temporary injunction for the Northern portion (1 H 26 R) of the property, but the operative order mistakenly mentioned "Southern side." The defendants opposed, arguing this was an intentional judicial decision, not a clerical error. Holding: The court found the error was accidental and correctable under Section 152 CPC. The entire discussion in the original order concerned only the Northern portion, matching the plaintiff's prayer. Correcting this error would not prejudice defendants since the status quo order covered the entire property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts