State of Maharashtra vs Dilip Dattu Umapure — 1622/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(f). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120037842022
Filing Number
3784/2022
Filing Date
08-Nov-2022
Registration No
1622/2024
Registration Date
08-Nov-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
240
Police Station
Kasar sirsi
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dilip Dattu Umapure
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court dismissed the case against accused Dilip Dattu Umapure under Section 258 of the CrPC, finding that despite multiple summons issued, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the matter pending. The accused was discharged from charges under Section 65(f) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, bail bonds were cancelled, and seized materials were ordered to be disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
13-Mar-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
16-Dec-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
11-Sep-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
19-Jun-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
13-Feb-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
23-Oct-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
18-Jul-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
19-Apr-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
06-Nov-2023
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
17-Jun-2023
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
15-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 1622/2024
The court dismissed the case against accused Dilip Dattu Umapure under Section 258 of the CrPC, finding that despite multiple summons issued, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the matter pending. The accused was discharged from charges under Section 65(f) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, bail bonds were cancelled, and seized materials were ordered to be disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts