State of Maharashtra vs Narsamma Pandurang Bhogile — 1287/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120034002025

Filing Number

2033/2025

Filing Date

28-Nov-2025

Registration No

1287/2025

Registration Date

29-Nov-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Narsamma Pandurang Bhogile

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Narsamma Pandurang Bhogile from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found it futile to keep the case pending as the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the CA report remained pending, and no purpose would be served by further delay. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were ordered disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1287/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Narsamma Pandurang Bhogile from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found it futile to keep the case pending as the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the CA report remained pending, and no purpose would be served by further delay. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were ordered disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case