State of Maharashtra vs Sandip Tanaji Ghosle — 3018/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120033632024

Filing Number

3363/2024

Filing Date

21-Dec-2024

Registration No

3018/2024

Registration Date

21-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

Excise Department, Latur

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sandip Tanaji Ghosle

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Sandip Tanaji Ghosle from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The discharge was granted because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the CA report was not received, and continuing the case served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 28-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 19-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 28-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 02-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 21-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3018/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Sandip Tanaji Ghosle from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The discharge was granted because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the CA report was not received, and continuing the case served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case