State of Maharashtra vs Gunvantabai Bandu Tumkute — 2820/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120033272024

Case disposed

Filing Number

3327/2024

Filing Date

17-12-2024

Registration No

2820/2024

Registration Date

17-12-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

312

Police Station

Aurad Shahajani

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(a),65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Gunvantabai Bandu Tumkute

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Nilanga

13-03-2026

Disposed

09-02-2026

Appearance

26-11-2025

Appearance

19-08-2025

Appearance

28-04-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: SCC No. 2820/2024 The court discharged the accused Gunvantabai Bandu Tumkute from charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The discharge was granted because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the police failed to apprehend the accused, and the Forensic Analysis (CA) report remained unreceived, making further pendency futile. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SCC No. 2820/2024 The court discharged the accused Gunvantabai Bandu Tumkute from charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The discharge was granted because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the police failed to apprehend the accused, and the Forensic Analysis (CA) report remained unreceived, making further pendency futile. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case