State of Maharashtra vs Narsingh Gopalrao Vagdure — 2798/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120032612024

Filing Number

3261/2024

Filing Date

10-Dec-2024

Registration No

2798/2024

Registration Date

10-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

288

Police Station

Aurad Shahajani

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Narsingh Gopalrao Vagdure

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged the accused Narsingh Gopalrao Vagdure from the offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking its discretionary power under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The decision was made because multiple summons failed to locate the accused, the Chargeability (CA) report was not received, and further delay served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband declared worthless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 26-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 11-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 25-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 23-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2798/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused Narsingh Gopalrao Vagdure from the offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking its discretionary power under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The decision was made because multiple summons failed to locate the accused, the Chargeability (CA) report was not received, and further delay served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband declared worthless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case