State of Maharashtra vs Sopan Gunaji Bembalge — 1222/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120032332025

Filing Number

1942/2025

Filing Date

13-Nov-2025

Registration No

1222/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

202

Police Station

Kasar sirsi

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sopan Gunaji Bembalge

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Sopan Gunaji Bembalge under Section 281 of the BNSS in a case involving alleged violation of Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found the case suffered from prosecutorial negligence, with police unable to locate the accused despite multiple summons and no Complaint and Arrest (C.A.) report filed, making further delay futile. Consequently, bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  5. 28-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1222/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Sopan Gunaji Bembalge under Section 281 of the BNSS in a case involving alleged violation of Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found the case suffered from prosecutorial negligence, with police unable to locate the accused despite multiple summons and no Complaint and Arrest (C.A.) report filed, making further delay futile. Consequently, bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case