State of Maharashtra vs Satish Maruti Birajdar — 2334/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120031232024
Filing Number
3122/2024
Filing Date
19-Nov-2024
Registration No
2334/2024
Registration Date
19-Nov-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
109
Police Station
Excise Department, Latur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Satish Maruti Birajdar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Satish Maruti Birajdar (2334/2024) The court stopped the case against accused Satish Maruti Birajdar under Section 281 of BNSS, discharging him from the offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found that despite repeated summons, the accused could not be traced and the police machinery failed to apprehend him, making it improper to keep the case pending. Consequently, bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband was ordered disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
23-Dec-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
20-Sep-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
23-Jun-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
12-Mar-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
30-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 2334/2024
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Satish Maruti Birajdar (2334/2024) The court stopped the case against accused Satish Maruti Birajdar under Section 281 of BNSS, discharging him from the offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found that despite repeated summons, the accused could not be traced and the police machinery failed to apprehend him, making it improper to keep the case pending. Consequently, bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband was ordered disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts