State of Maharashtra vs Shetiba Timanna Aattikar — 2332/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120031042024
Filing Number
3104/2024
Filing Date
18-Nov-2024
Registration No
2332/2024
Registration Date
18-Nov-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
66
Police Station
Excise Department, Latur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shetiba Timanna Aattikar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: SCC No. 2332/2024 The court discharged the accused Shetiba Timanna Aattikar under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The discharge was ordered because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the police failed to apprehend him, the Chartered Accountant report was not received, and further delays served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband was ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
05-Mar-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
06-Dec-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
24-Sep-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
18-Jul-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
12-Mar-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
30-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 2332/2024
Case Summary: SCC No. 2332/2024 The court discharged the accused Shetiba Timanna Aattikar under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The discharge was ordered because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the police failed to apprehend him, the Chartered Accountant report was not received, and further delays served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband was ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts