State of Maharashtra vs Shetiba Timanna Aattikar — 2332/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120031042024

Case disposed

Filing Number

3104/2024

Filing Date

18-11-2024

Registration No

2332/2024

Registration Date

18-11-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

66

Police Station

Excise Department, Latur

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Shetiba Timanna Aattikar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Nilanga

13-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

Appearance

06-12-2025

Appearance

24-09-2025

Appearance

18-07-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: SCC No. 2332/2024 The court discharged the accused Shetiba Timanna Aattikar under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The discharge was ordered because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the police failed to apprehend him, the Chartered Accountant report was not received, and further delays served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband was ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SCC No. 2332/2024 The court discharged the accused Shetiba Timanna Aattikar under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The discharge was ordered because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the police failed to apprehend him, the Chartered Accountant report was not received, and further delays served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband was ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case