State of Maharashtra vs Madhukar Ramesh Kamble — 2324/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120030882024

Filing Number

3088/2024

Filing Date

16-Nov-2024

Registration No

2324/2024

Registration Date

16-Nov-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

191

Police Station

Shirur Anantpal

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Madhukar Ramesh Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Madhukar Ramesh Kamble under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in a liquor prohibition case, citing the accused's inability to be traced despite multiple summons, failure to obtain the Competent Authority (CA) report, and the absence of any purpose in prolonging proceedings. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 23-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 15-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 19-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 29-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2324/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Madhukar Ramesh Kamble under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in a liquor prohibition case, citing the accused's inability to be traced despite multiple summons, failure to obtain the Competent Authority (CA) report, and the absence of any purpose in prolonging proceedings. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case