State of Maharashtra vs Vaibhav Ashokrao Pawar — 2308/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120030682024

Filing Number

3061/2024

Filing Date

14-Nov-2024

Registration No

2308/2024

Registration Date

15-Nov-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

112

Police Station

Excise Department, Udgir

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vaibhav Ashokrao Pawar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Nilanga JMFC court discharged accused Vaibhav Ashokrao Pawar under Section 258 CrPC in a Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, citing that multiple summons failed to locate the accused, the CA report was not received, and no purpose would be served by further delay. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband declared worthless for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 25-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 23-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 12-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 28-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 14-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2308/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Nilanga JMFC court discharged accused Vaibhav Ashokrao Pawar under Section 258 CrPC in a Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, citing that multiple summons failed to locate the accused, the CA report was not received, and no purpose would be served by further delay. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband declared worthless for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case