State of Maharashtra vs Kumar Manik Bhosale — 2306/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120030662024

Filing Number

3059/2024

Filing Date

14-Nov-2024

Registration No

2306/2024

Registration Date

15-Nov-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

116

Police Station

Excise Department, Udgir

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kumar Manik Bhosale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: SCC No. 2306/2024 The court discharged accused Kumar Manik Bhosale from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The discharge was ordered because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the police failed to apprehend him, and the Forensic Chemistry report was not received, making further pendency futile. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 26-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 25-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 12-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 28-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 14-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2306/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SCC No. 2306/2024 The court discharged accused Kumar Manik Bhosale from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The discharge was ordered because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the police failed to apprehend him, and the Forensic Chemistry report was not received, making further pendency futile. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case