State of Maharashtra vs Sampata Satish Shinde — 2298/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120030442024

Filing Number

3043/2024

Filing Date

13-Nov-2024

Registration No

2298/2024

Registration Date

14-Nov-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

Excise Department, Latur

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sampata Satish Shinde

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged the accused Sampata Satish Shinde under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in a liquor prohibition case, citing the accused's inability to be traced despite multiple summons and the non-receipt of the Constable's report. The court found no purpose in keeping the matter pending and cancelled the bail bonds accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 30-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 20-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 24-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 12-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 28-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 13-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2298/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused Sampata Satish Shinde under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in a liquor prohibition case, citing the accused's inability to be traced despite multiple summons and the non-receipt of the Constable's report. The court found no purpose in keeping the matter pending and cancelled the bail bonds accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case