State of Maharashtra vs Irappa Shivmurti Kalshetti — 2290/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120030342024

Filing Number

3034/2024

Filing Date

12-Nov-2024

Registration No

2290/2024

Registration Date

13-Nov-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

342

Police Station

Nilanga

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Irappa Shivmurti Kalshetti

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 2290/2024 Summary: The court discharged the accused Irappa Shivmurti Kalshetti from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that despite multiple summons, the accused could not be traced, no Characterization Analysis (CA) report was received, and further delay served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband was ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 09-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 18-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 07-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 27-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2290/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 2290/2024 Summary: The court discharged the accused Irappa Shivmurti Kalshetti from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that despite multiple summons, the accused could not be traced, no Characterization Analysis (CA) report was received, and further delay served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband was ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case