State of Maharashtra vs Sagar Balaji Zaripatke — 2272/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120029852024
Filing Number
2980/2024
Filing Date
11-Nov-2024
Registration No
2272/2024
Registration Date
11-Nov-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
172
Police Station
Excise Department, Udgir
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sagar Balaji Zaripatke
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sagar Balaji Zaripatke (2272/2024) The court stopped proceedings against the accused under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing inability to trace the accused despite multiple summons and police efforts, combined with non-receipt of the Investigating Officer's report. The accused was discharged from the offense, bail bonds were cancelled, and seized materials ordered to be disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
23-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
03-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
13-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
26-Mar-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
25-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 2272/2024
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sagar Balaji Zaripatke (2272/2024) The court stopped proceedings against the accused under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing inability to trace the accused despite multiple summons and police efforts, combined with non-receipt of the Investigating Officer's report. The accused was discharged from the offense, bail bonds were cancelled, and seized materials ordered to be disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts