State of Maharashtra vs Datta Vitthal Dagdade — 2165/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120028762024

Filing Number

2876/2024

Filing Date

22-Oct-2024

Registration No

2165/2024

Registration Date

22-Oct-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

212

Police Station

Kasar sirsi

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Datta Vitthal Dagdade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped the case against accused Datta Vitthal Dagdade under Section 281 of BNSS due to his non-traceability despite multiple summons and failed police efforts to apprehend him. The accused was discharged from the Section 65(e) Bombay Prohibition Act offense, his bail bonds were cancelled, and seized contraband declared worthless and disposed per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 19-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 19-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 17-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  9. 05-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 22-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2165/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped the case against accused Datta Vitthal Dagdade under Section 281 of BNSS due to his non-traceability despite multiple summons and failed police efforts to apprehend him. The accused was discharged from the Section 65(e) Bombay Prohibition Act offense, his bail bonds were cancelled, and seized contraband declared worthless and disposed per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case