State of Maharashtra vs Balvant Ismail Londhe — 2161/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120028512024

Filing Number

2850/2024

Filing Date

19-Oct-2024

Registration No

2161/2024

Registration Date

19-Oct-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

294

Police Station

Nilanga

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balvant Ismail Londhe

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped the case against accused Balvant Ismail Londhe under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (discharge provision) due to the accused remaining untraceable despite multiple summons and failure of police machinery to apprehend him, along with non-receipt of the CA report. The accused was discharged from the Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(e) offense, his bail bond was cancelled, and seized contraband was ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 26-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 20-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 19-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 17-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 04-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 19-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2161/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped the case against accused Balvant Ismail Londhe under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (discharge provision) due to the accused remaining untraceable despite multiple summons and failure of police machinery to apprehend him, along with non-receipt of the CA report. The accused was discharged from the Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(e) offense, his bail bond was cancelled, and seized contraband was ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case