State of Maharashtra vs Sayaba Mahadu Kanade — 2044/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(f). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120028112024

Filing Number

2807/2024

Filing Date

14-Oct-2024

Registration No

2044/2024

Registration Date

14-Oct-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

187

Police Station

Kasar sirsi

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(f)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sayaba Mahadu Kanade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sayaba Mahadu Kanade (2044/2024) The court discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023, in a Bombay Prohibition Act case after the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons and police efforts. The court found that no purpose would be served by keeping the matter pending indefinitely, especially given that the Chartered Accountant report remained unreceived and further prosecution appeared futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 30-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 22-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 21-May-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 25-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 25-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 14-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2044/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sayaba Mahadu Kanade (2044/2024) The court discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023, in a Bombay Prohibition Act case after the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons and police efforts. The court found that no purpose would be served by keeping the matter pending indefinitely, especially given that the Chartered Accountant report remained unreceived and further prosecution appeared futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case