State of Maharashtra vs Dnyaneshwar Maruti Biradar — 1895/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120026712024

Filing Number

2663/2024

Filing Date

27-Sep-2024

Registration No

1895/2024

Registration Date

27-Sep-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

266

Police Station

Aurad Shahajani

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dnyaneshwar Maruti Biradar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The court stopped the case against accused Dnyaneshwar Maruti Biradar under Section 281 BNSS, discharging him from the offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found it impractical to keep the case pending since despite multiple summons, the accused remained untraceable and the police failed to apprehend him, with no purpose served by further delay. Consequently, bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband was ordered disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 17-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 20-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 16-May-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 23-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 08-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1895/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped the case against accused Dnyaneshwar Maruti Biradar under Section 281 BNSS, discharging him from the offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found it impractical to keep the case pending since despite multiple summons, the accused remained untraceable and the police failed to apprehend him, with no purpose served by further delay. Consequently, bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband was ordered disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case