State of Maharashtra vs Ramkishan Vishwanath Suryawanshi — 868/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120025162025

Filing Number

1457/2025

Filing Date

09-Sep-2025

Registration No

868/2025

Registration Date

09-Sep-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

183

Police Station

Aurad Shahajani

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramkishan Vishwanath Suryawanshi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ramkishan Vishwanath Suryawanshi (868/2025) The court discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023, in a liquor prohibition case (Section 65(e) of Bombay Prohibition Act) after multiple summons failed to locate the accused and the investigation report remained pending. The court found no purpose in keeping the case pending and ordered cancellation of bail bonds and disposal of seized items. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 23-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 868/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ramkishan Vishwanath Suryawanshi (868/2025) The court discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023, in a liquor prohibition case (Section 65(e) of Bombay Prohibition Act) after multiple summons failed to locate the accused and the investigation report remained pending. The court found no purpose in keeping the case pending and ordered cancellation of bail bonds and disposal of seized items. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case