State of Maharashtra vs Maruti Mahadev Kamble — 1807/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120025152024

Filing Number

2515/2024

Filing Date

12-Sep-2024

Registration No

1807/2024

Registration Date

12-Sep-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

158

Police Station

Shirur Anantpal

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maruti Mahadev Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The court discharged accused Maruti Mahadev Kamble from charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023. The discharge was granted because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the CA report remained pending, and continuing the case served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were ordered disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 22-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 18-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 20-May-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 15-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 14-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  9. 25-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1807/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Maruti Mahadev Kamble from charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023. The discharge was granted because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the CA report remained pending, and continuing the case served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were ordered disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case