State of Maharashtra vs Sunil Pndit Kamble — 1496/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120023412024

Filing Number

2341/2024

Filing Date

21-Aug-2024

Registration No

1496/2024

Registration Date

22-Aug-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

254

Police Station

Nilanga

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Pndit Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The court discharged accused Sunil Pandit Kamble of charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The discharge was ordered due to repeated failure to trace the accused despite multiple summons, non-receipt of the CA report, and absence of purpose in further pendency. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 29-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 23-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 21-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 04-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  9. 03-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 21-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1496/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Sunil Pandit Kamble of charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The discharge was ordered due to repeated failure to trace the accused despite multiple summons, non-receipt of the CA report, and absence of purpose in further pendency. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case