State of Maharashtra vs Nagabai Suryabhan Revne — 981/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120020322024
Filing Number
2032/2024
Filing Date
24-Jul-2024
Registration No
981/2024
Registration Date
24-Jul-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
78
Police Station
Excise Department, Udgir
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nagabai Suryabhan Revne
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court discharged the accused Nagabai Suryabhan Revne under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in a case involving alleged violation of Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing failure to trace the accused despite multiple summons and non-receipt of the CA report. The court found it pointless to keep the case pending and cancelled the bail bonds, directing disposal of seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
04-Mar-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
05-Dec-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
24-Sep-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
18-Jul-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
17-Apr-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
18-Dec-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
20-Nov-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
07-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 981/2024
The court discharged the accused Nagabai Suryabhan Revne under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in a case involving alleged violation of Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing failure to trace the accused despite multiple summons and non-receipt of the CA report. The court found it pointless to keep the case pending and cancelled the bail bonds, directing disposal of seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts