State of Maharashtra vs Narahari Bapu Jogadand — 973/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120019942024

Filing Number

1992/2024

Filing Date

23-Jul-2024

Registration No

973/2024

Registration Date

23-Jul-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

159

Police Station

Nilanga

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Narahari Bapu Jogadand

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The court dismissed the case against accused Narahari Bapu Jogadand under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita due to inability to trace the accused despite multiple summons and failure to receive the Competent Authority report. The accused was discharged from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, bail bonds were cancelled, and seized materials were ordered disposed as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 09-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 25-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 29-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 19-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  9. 06-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 23-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 973/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the case against accused Narahari Bapu Jogadand under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita due to inability to trace the accused despite multiple summons and failure to receive the Competent Authority report. The accused was discharged from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, bail bonds were cancelled, and seized materials were ordered disposed as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case