State of Maharashtra vs Sham Vasant Upapure — 652/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(f). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120019622025

Filing Number

1134/2025

Filing Date

10-Jul-2025

Registration No

652/2025

Registration Date

10-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

70

Police Station

Kasar sirsi

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(f)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sham Vasant Upapure

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 652/2025 The court discharged accused Sham Vasant Upapure from charges under Section 65(f) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the BNSS. The court found the prosecution negligent after multiple unsuccessful summons, no Chargesheet filed, and inability to locate the accused, determining further delay would serve no purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  5. 28-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  6. 24-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 652/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 652/2025 The court discharged accused Sham Vasant Upapure from charges under Section 65(f) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the BNSS. The court found the prosecution negligent after multiple unsuccessful summons, no Chargesheet filed, and inability to locate the accused, determining further delay would serve no purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case