State of Maharashtra vs Dhanraj Suresh alias Suryabhan Revane — 649/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120019592025

Filing Number

1131/2025

Filing Date

10-Jul-2025

Registration No

649/2025

Registration Date

10-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

53

Police Station

Kasar sirsi

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dhanraj Suresh alias Suryabhan Revane

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings against accused Dhanraj Suresh under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023 in a Bombay Prohibition Act case (Section 65(a)(e)) due to the accused's inability to be traced despite multiple summons and unavailability of the Investigating Officer's report. The accused was discharged from the offense, bail bonds were cancelled, and seized materials were ordered disposed of as worthless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 17-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 24-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 649/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against accused Dhanraj Suresh under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023 in a Bombay Prohibition Act case (Section 65(a)(e)) due to the accused's inability to be traced despite multiple summons and unavailability of the Investigating Officer's report. The accused was discharged from the offense, bail bonds were cancelled, and seized materials were ordered disposed of as worthless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case