State of Maharashtra vs Shesherao Shankar Tompe — 2453/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120018392023
e-Filing Number
23-06-2023
Filing Number
1839/2023
Filing Date
11-Jul-2023
Registration No
2453/2024
Registration Date
11-Jul-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
122
Police Station
Aurad Shahajani
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shesherao Shankar Tompe
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shesherao Shankar Tompe (2453/2024) The court discharged the accused under Section 258 of the CrPC in a Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, as the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons and police efforts failed to apprehend him. The court found it futile to keep the case pending given the missing Chartered Accountant report and absence of the accused, warranting case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
22-Jan-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
06-Oct-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
22-Jul-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
19-Mar-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
23-Nov-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
20-Nov-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
20-Aug-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
14-Jun-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
27-Feb-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
26-Oct-2023
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
04-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 2453/2024
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shesherao Shankar Tompe (2453/2024) The court discharged the accused under Section 258 of the CrPC in a Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, as the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons and police efforts failed to apprehend him. The court found it futile to keep the case pending given the missing Chartered Accountant report and absence of the accused, warranting case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts