State of Maharashtra vs Anusayabai Rohidas Kamble — 580/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120017132025

Filing Number

997/2025

Filing Date

20-Jun-2025

Registration No

580/2025

Registration Date

20-Jun-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

84

Police Station

Excise Department, Latur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anusayabai Rohidas Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Anusayabai Rohidas Kamble (580/2025) The court discharged the accused from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of BNSS due to prosecutorial negligence. Multiple witness summons were issued but police failed to locate witnesses and no investigation report was produced, rendering continued prosecution purposeless. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were ordered disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  8. 10-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 580/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Anusayabai Rohidas Kamble (580/2025) The court discharged the accused from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of BNSS due to prosecutorial negligence. Multiple witness summons were issued but police failed to locate witnesses and no investigation report was produced, rendering continued prosecution purposeless. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were ordered disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case