State of Maharashtra vs Shesherao alias Shashikant Ashok Trimukhe — 2701/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120017092023
Filing Number
1709/2023
Filing Date
03-Jul-2023
Registration No
2701/2024
Registration Date
03-Jul-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
77
Police Station
Aurad Shahajani
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shesherao alias Shashikant Ashok Trimukhe
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court discharged accused Shesherao alias Shashikant Ashok Trimukhe from charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, finding that the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons and the CA report remained pending. The court held that further delay served no purpose and ordered cancellation of bail bonds and disposal of seized material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
10-Mar-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
23-Dec-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
22-Sep-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
19-Jun-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
13-Feb-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
16-Oct-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
30-Aug-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
13-Jun-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
22-Mar-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
20-Nov-2023
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
20-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 2701/2024
The court discharged accused Shesherao alias Shashikant Ashok Trimukhe from charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, finding that the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons and the CA report remained pending. The court held that further delay served no purpose and ordered cancellation of bail bonds and disposal of seized material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts