State of Maharashtra vs Prashant Baburao Gobade — 561/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e),68. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120016542025

Filing Number

969/2025

Filing Date

18-Jun-2025

Registration No

561/2025

Registration Date

18-Jun-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

113

Police Station

Excise Department, Latur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e),68

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prashant Baburao Gobade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Prashant Baburao Gobade under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023, citing the accused's inability to be traced despite multiple summons and the non-receipt of the Competent Authority report. The court found no purpose in keeping the case pending and accordingly discharged him from offences under Sections 65(e) and 68 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, cancelled his bail bonds, and ordered disposal of seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 16-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 29-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 07-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 561/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Prashant Baburao Gobade under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023, citing the accused's inability to be traced despite multiple summons and the non-receipt of the Competent Authority report. The court found no purpose in keeping the case pending and accordingly discharged him from offences under Sections 65(e) and 68 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, cancelled his bail bonds, and ordered disposal of seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case